Cost Accounting Answers

CHAPTER 4 JOB COSTING 4-1Cost pool––a grouping of individual indirect cost items. Cost tracing––the assigning of direct costs to the chosen cost object. Cost allocation––the assigning of indirect costs to the chosen cost object. Cost-allocation base––a factor that links in a systematic way an indirect cost or group of indirect costs to cost objects. 4-2In a job-costing system, costs are assigned to a distinct unit, batch, or lot of a product or service.In a process-costing system, the cost of a product or service is obtained by using broad averages to assign costs to masses of identical or similar units. 4-3An advertising campaign for Pepsi is likely to be very specific to that individual client. Job costing enables all the specific aspects of each job to be identified. In contrast, the processing of checking account withdrawals is similar for many customers. Here, process costing can be used to compute the cost of each checking account withdrawal. -4The seven steps in job costing are: (1) identify the job that is the chosen cost object, (2) identify the direct costs of the job, (3) select the cost-allocation bases to use for allocating indirect costs to the job, (4) identify the indirect costs associated with each cost-allocation base, (5) compute the rate per unit of each cost-allocation base used to allocate indirect costs to the job, (6) compute the indirect costs allocated to the job, and (7) compute the total cost of the job by adding all direct and indirect costs assigned to the job. -5Major cost objects that managers focus on in companies using job costing are a product such as a specialized machine, a service such as a repair job, a project such as running the Expo, or a task such as an advertising campaign. 4-6Three major source documents used in job-costing systems are (1) job cost ecord or job cost sheet, a document that records and accumulates all costs assigned to a specific job, starting whe n work begins (2) materials requisition record, a document that contains information about the cost of direct materials used on a specific job and in a specific department; and (3) labor-time sheet, a document that contains information about the amount of labor time used for a specific job in a specific department. -7The main advantages of using computerized source documents for job cost records are the accuracy of the records and the ability to provide managers with instantaneous feedback to help control job costs. 4-8Two reasons for using an annual budget period are a. The numerator reason––the longer the time period, the less the influence of seasonal patterns in overhead costs, and b. The denominator reason––the longer the time period, the less the effect of variations in output levels or quantities of the cost-allocation bases on the allocation of fixed costs. -9Actual costing and normal costing differ in their use of actual or budgeted indirect cost rates: | |Actual |Normal | | |Costing |Costing | |Direct-cost rates |Actual rates |Actual rates | |Indirect-cost rates |Actual rates |Budgeted rates |Each costing method uses the actual quantity of the direct-cost input and the actual quantity of the cost-allocation base. 4-10A house construction firm can use job cost information (a) to determine the profitability of individual jobs, (b) to assist in bidding on future jobs, and (c) to evaluate professionals who are in charge of managing individual jobs. 4-11The statement is false. In a normal costing system, the Manufacturing Overhead Control account will not, in general, equal the amounts in the Manufacturing Overhead Allocated account.The Manufacturing Overhead Control account aggregates the actual overhead costs incurred while Manufacturing Overhead Allocated allocates overhead costs to jobs on the basis of a budgeted rate times the actual quantity of the cost-allocation base. Underallocation or overallocation of indirect (overh ead) costs can arise because of (a) the Numerator reason––the actual overhead costs differ from the budgeted overhead costs, and (b) the Denominator reason––the actual quantity used of the allocation base differs from the budgeted quantity. 4-12Debit entries to Work-in-Process Control represent increases in work in process.Examples of debit entries under normal costing are (a) direct materials used (credit to Materials Control), (b) direct manufacturing labor billed to job (credit to Wages Payable Control), and (c) manufacturing overhead allocated to job (credit to Manufacturing Overhead Allocated). 4-13Alternative ways to make end-of-period adjustments to dispose of underallocated or overallocated overhead are as follows: (i)Proration based on the total amount of indirect costs allocated (before proration) in the ending balances of work in process, finished goods, and cost of goods sold. ii)Proration based on total ending balances (before proration) in w ork in process, finished goods, and cost of goods sold. iii) Year-end write-off to Cost of Goods Sold. iv) The adjusted allocation rate approach that restates all overhead entries using actual indirect cost rates rather than budgeted indirect cost rates. 4-14A company might use budgeted costs rather than actual costs to compute direct labor rates because it may be difficult to trace direct labor costs to jobs as they are completed (for example, because bonuses are only known at the end of the year). -15Modern technology of electronic data interchange (EDI) is helpful to managers because it ensures that a purchase order is transmitted quickly and accurately to suppliers with minimum paperwork and costs. 16. (10 min) Job order costing, process costing. a. Job costingl. Job costing b. Process costingm. Process costing c. Job costingn. Job costing d. Process costingo. Job costing e. Job costingp. Job costing f. Process costingq. Job costing g. Job costingr. Process costing h. Job costin g (but some process costing)s. Job costing i.Process costingt. Process costing j. Process costingu. Job costing k. Job costing 4-17(20 min. )Actual costing, normal costing, accounting for manufacturing overhead. 1. [pic]=[pic] =[pic]= 1. 80 or 180% [pic]=[pic] =[pic]= 1. 9 or 190% 2. Costs of Job 626 under actual and normal costing follow: ActualNormal CostingCosting Direct materials$ 40,000$ 40,000 Direct manufacturing labor costs30,00030,000 Manufacturing overhead costs $30,000 ( 1. 90; $30,000 ( 1. 80 57,000 54,000 Total manufacturing costs of Job 626$127,000$124,000 3. pic]=[pic] ( [pic] =$1,450,000 ( 1. 80 =$2,610,000 [pic]=[pic] – [pic] =$2,755,000 ( $2,610,000 = $145,000 There is no under- or overallocated overhead under actual costing because overhead is allocated under actual costing by multiplying actual manufacturing labor costs and the actual manufacturing overhead rate. This, of course equals the actual manufacturing overhead costs. All actual overhead costs are allocated to products. Hence, there is no under- or overallocated overhead. 4-18(20 -30 min. ) Job costing, normal and actual costing. 1. pic]=[pic] = [pic] =$50 per direct labor-hour [pic]=[pic] = [pic] =$40 per direct labor-hour These rates differ because both the numerator and the denominator in the two calculations are different—one based on budgeted numbers and the other based on actual numbers. |2a. |Laguna |Mission | | |Model |Model | | Normal costing | | | |Direct costs | | |Direct materials |$106,760 |$127,550 | |Direct labor |36,950 |41,320 | | |143,710 |168,870 | |Indirect costs | | | |Assembly support ($50 ( 960; $50 ( 1,050) |48,000 |52,500 | |Total costs |$191,710 |$221,370 | |2b.Actual costing | | | |Direct costs | | | |Direct materials |$106,760 |$127,550 | |Direct labor |36,950 |41,320 | | |143,710 |168,870 | |Indirect costs | | | |Assembly support ($40 ( 960; $40 ( 1,050) |38,400 |42,000 | |Total costs |$182,110 |$210,870 | 3. Normal costing enables Am esbury to report a job cost as soon as the job is completed, assuming that both the direct materials and direct labor costs are known at the time of use. Once the 960 direct labor-hours are known for the Laguna Model (June 2011), Amesbury can compute the $191,710 cost figure using normal costing. Amesbury can use this information to manage the costs of the Laguna Model job as well as to bid on similar jobs later in the year. In contrast, Amesbury has to wait until the December 2011 year-end to compute the $182,110 cost of the Laguna Model using actual costing.Although not required, the following overview diagram summarizes Amesbury Construction’s job-costing system. [pic] 4-19(10 min. )Budgeted manufacturing overhead rate, allocated manufacturing overhead. 1. Budgeted manufacturing overhead rate = [pic] = [pic] = $24 per machine-hour |2. |Manufacturing |= |Actual |( |Budgeted manufacturing | | |overhead | |machine-hours | |overhead rate | | |allocated | | | | | = 170,000 ? $2 4 = $4,080,000 3.Since manufacturing overhead allocated is greater than the actual manufacturing overhead costs, Gammaro overallocated manufacturing overhead: Manufacturing overhead allocated$4,080,000 Actual manufacturing overhead costs 4,050,000 Overallocated manufacturing overhead$ 30,000 4-20(20-30 min. )Job costing, accounting for manufacturing overhead, budgeted rates. 1. An overview of the product costing system is [pic] Budgeted manufacturing overhead divided by allocation base: Machining overhead:[pic] = $36 per machine-hour Assembly overhead:[pic] = 180% of direct manuf. labor costs 2. Machining department, 2,000 hours ( $36$72,000 Assembly department, 180% ( $15,000 27,000 Total manufacturing overhead allocated to Job 494$99,000 3.MachiningAssembly Actual manufacturing overhead$2,100,000$ 3,700,000 Manufacturing overhead allocated, $36 ( 55,000 machine-hours1,980,000— 180% ( $2,200,000 — 3,960,000 Underallocated (Overallocated)$ 120,000$ (260,000) 4-21 (20(2 5 min. ) Job costing, consulting firm. 1. Budgeted indirect-cost rate for client support can be calculated as follows: Budgeted indirect-cost rate = $13,600,000 ? $5,312,500 = 256% of professional labor costs 2. At the budgeted revenues of $21,250,000 Taylor’s operating income of $2,337,500 equals 11% of revenues. Markup rate = $21,250,000 ? $5,312,500 = 400% of direct professional labor costs 3. Budgeted costsDirect costs: Director, $198 ( 4$ 792 Partner, $101 ( 171,717 Associate, $49 ( 422,058 Assistant, $36 ( 153 5,508$10,075 Indirect costs: Consulting support, 256% ( $10,075 25,792 Total costs$35,867 As calculated in requirement 2, the bid price to earn an 11% income-to-revenue margin is 400% of direct professional costs. Therefore, Taylor should bid 4 ( $10,075 = $40,300 for the Red Rooster job. Bid price to earn target operating income-to-revenue margin of 11% can also be calculated as follows: Let R = revenue to earn target income R – 0. 11R = $35,867 0. 89R = $ 35,867 R = $35,867 ? 0. 89 = $40,300 Or Direct costs $10,075 Indirect costs 25,792Operating income (0. 11 ( $40,300) 4,433 Bid price$40,300 4-22(15–20 min. )Time period used to compute indirect cost rates. 1. | |Quarter | | |1 |2 |3 |4 |Annual | |(1) Pools sold |700 |500 |150 |150 |1,500 | |(2) Direct manufacturing labor hours (0. 5 ( |350 |250 |75 |75 |750 | Row 1) | | | | | | |(3) Fixed manufacturing overhead costs |$10,500 |$10,500 |$10,500 |$10,500 |$42,000 | |(4) Budgeted fixed manufacturing overhead |$30 |$42 |$140 |$140 |$56 | |rate per direct manufacturing labor hour | | | | | | |($10,500 ( Row 2) | | | | | | | |Budgeted Costs Based on Quarterly | | |Manufacturing Overhead Rate | | |2nd Quarter |3rd Quarter | |Direct material costs ($7. 0 ( 500 pools; 150 pools) |$ 3,750 |$ 1,125 | |Direct manufacturing labor costs |4,000 |1,200 | |($16 ( 250 hours; 75 hours) | | | |Variable manufacturing overhead costs |3,000 |900 | |($12 ( 250 hours; 75 hours) | | | |Fixed manufac turing overhead costs | 10,500 | 10,500 | |($42 ( 250 hours; $140 ? 5 hours) | | | |Total manufacturing costs |$21,250 |$13,725 | |Divided by pools manufactured each quarter | ? 500 | ? 150 | |Manufacturing cost per pool |$ 42. 50 |$ 91. 50 | 2. | |Budgeted Costs Based on Annual Manufacturing | | |Overhead Rate | | |2nd Quarter |3rd Quarter | |Direct material costs ($7. 0 ( 500 pools; 150 pools) |$ 3,750 |$1,125 | |Direct manufacturing labor costs |4,000 |1,200 | |($16 ( 250 hours; 75 hours) | | | |Variable manufacturing overhead costs |3,000 |900 | |($12 ( 250 hours; 75 hours) | | | |Fixed manufacturing overhead costs | 14,000 | 4,200 | |($56 ( 250 hours; 75 hours) | | | |Total manufacturing costs |$24,750 |$7,425 | |Divided by pools manufactured each quarter | ( 500 | ( 150 | |Manufacturing cost per pool |$ 49. 50 |$49. 50 | 3. | |2nd Quarter |3rd Quarter | |Prices based on quarterly budgeted manufacturing overhead rates calculated in |$55. 25 |$118. 5 | |requirement 1 | | | |($42. 50 ( 130%; $91. 50 ( 130%) | | | |Price based on annual budgeted manufacturing overhead rates calculated in |$64. 35 |$64. 35 | |requirement 2 | | | |($49. 50 ( 130%; $49. 50 ( 130%) | | |Splash should use the budgeted annual manufacturing overhead rate because capacity decisions are based on longer annual periods rather than quarterly periods. Prices should not vary based on quarterly fluctuations in production. Splash could vary prices based on market conditions and demand for its pools. In this case, Splash would charge higher prices in quarter 2 when demand for its pools is high. Pricing based on quarterly budgets would cause Splash to do the opposite—to decrease rather than increase prices! 4-23(10–15 min. ) Accounting for manufacturing overhead. 1. Budgeted manufacturing overhead rate= [pic] = $30 per machine-hour 2. Work-in-Process Control7,350,000 Manufacturing Overhead Allocated7,350,000 (245,000 machine-hours ( $30 per machine-hour = $7,350,000) 3. 7,350,000– $7,300,000 = $50,000 overallocated, an insignificant amount of actual manufacturing overhead costs $50,000 ? $7,300,000 = 0. 68%. Manufacturing Overhead Allocated7,350,000 Manufacturing Department Overhead Control7,300,000 Cost of Goods Sold50,000 4-24(35(45 min. ) Job costing, journal entries. Some instructors may also want to assign Exercise 4-25. It demonstrates the relationships of the general ledger to the underlying subsidiary ledgers and source documents. 1. An overview of the product costing system is: 2. & 3. This answer assumes COGS given of $4,020 does not include the writeoff of overallocated manufacturing overhead. |2. (1) Materials Control |800 | | | |Accounts Payable Control | |800 | | |(2) Work-in-Process Control |710 | | | |Materials Control | |710 | | |(3) Manufacturing Overhead Control |100 | | | |Materials Control | |100 | | |(4) Work-in-Process Control |1,300 | | | |Manufacturing Overhead Control |900 | | | |Wages Payable Control | |2,200 | | |(5) Manufacturing Overhead Control | 400 | | | |Accumulated Depreciation––buildings and | | | | |manufacturing equipment | |400 | | |(6) Manufacturing Overhead Control | 550 | | | |Miscellaneous accounts | |550 | | |(7) Work-in-Process Control |2,080 | | | |Manufacturing Overhead Allocated | |2,080 | | |(1. 60 ( $1,300 = $2,080) | | | | |(8) Finished Goods Control |4,120 | | | |Work-in-Process Control |4,120 | | |(9) Accounts Receivable Control (or Cash) |8,000 | | | |Revenues | |8,000 | | |(10) Cost of Goods Sold |4,020 | | | |Finished Goods Control | |4,020 | | |(11) Manufacturing Overhead Allocated |2,080 | | | |Manufacturing Overhead Control | |1,950 | | |Cost of Goods Sold | |130 | 3. |Materials Control | |Bal. /1/2011 |100 |(2) Work-in-Process Control (Materials used) | | |(1) Accounts Payable Control | |(3) Manufacturing Overhead Control (Materials |710 | |(Purchases) |800 |used) | | | | | |100 | |Bal. 12/31/2011 |90 | | | |Work-in-Process Control | |B al. /1/2011 |60 |(8) Finished Goods Control (Goods completed) | | |(2) Materials Control (Direct | | |4,120 | |materials) |710 | | | |(4) Wages Payable Control (Direct | | | | |manuf. labor) | | | | |(7) Manuf. Overhead Allocated |1,300 | | | | | | | | | |2,080 | | | |Bal. 2/31/2011 |30 | | | |Finished Goods Control | |Bal. 1/1/2011 |500 |(10) Cost of Goods Sold |4,020 | |(8) WIP Control | | | | |(Goods completed) |4,120 | | | |Bal. 12/31/2011 |600 | | | Cost of Goods Sold | |(10) Finished Goods Control (Goods | |(11) Manufacturing Overhead Allocated (Adjust | | |sold) |4,020 |for overallocation) | | | | | |130 | |Bal. 12/31/2011 |3,890 | | | |Manufacturing Overhead Control | | (3) Materials Control (Indirect materials)| |(11) To close |1,950 | |(4) Wages Payable Control (Indirect manuf. |100 | | | |labor) | | | | |(5) Accum. Deprn.Control (Depreciation) |900 | | | |(6) Accounts Payable Control | | | | |(Miscellaneous) |400 | | | | | | | | | |550 | | | |Bal. |0 | | | Manufacturing Overhead Allocated | |(11) To close |2,080 |(7) Work-in-Process Control (Manuf. overhead | | | | |allocated) |2,080 | | | |Bal. | 0 | 4-25(35 minutes) Journal entries, T-accounts, and source documents. 1. i. Direct Materials Control 124,000 Accounts Payable Control124,000 Source Document: Purchase Invoice, Receiving Report Subsidiary Ledger: Direct Materials Record, Accounts Payable ii. Work in Process Control a 122,000 Direct Materials Control122,000Source Document: Material Requisition Records, Job Cost Record Subsidiary Ledger: Direct Materials Record, Work-in-Process Inventory Records by Jobs iii. Work in Process Control80,000 Manufacturing Overhead Control54,500 Wages Payable Control134,500 Source Document: Labor Time Sheets, Job Cost Records Subsidiary Ledger:, Manufacturing Overhead Records, Employee Labor Records, Work-in-Process Inventory Records by Jobs iv. Manufacturing Overhead Control129,500 Salaries Payable Control 20,000 Accounts Payable Control 9,500 Accumulated Depreciation Control 30,000 Rent Payable Control 70,000 Source Document: Depreciation Schedule, Rent Schedule, Maintenance wages due, Invoices for miscellaneous factory overhead items Subsidiary Ledger: Manufacturing Overhead Records v.Work in Process Control200,000 Manufacturing Overhead Allocated200,000 ($80,000 [pic] $2. 50) Source Document: Labor Time Sheets, Job Cost Record Subsidiary Ledger: Work-in-Process Inventory Records by Jobs vi. Finished Goods Control b387,000 Work in Process Control387,000 Source Document: Job Cost Record, Completed Job Cost Record Subsidiary Ledger: Work-in-Process Inventory Records by Jobs, Finished Goods Inventory Records by Jobs vii. Cost of Goods Sold c432,000 Finished Goods Control432,000 Source Document: Sales Invoice, Completed Job Cost Record Subsidiary Ledger: Finished Goods Inventory Records by Jobs viii. Manufacturing Overhead Allocated200,000Manufacturing Overhead Control ($129,500 + $54,500)184,000 Cost of Goods Sold 16,000 Source Document: Prior Journal Entries ix. Administrative Expenses 7,000 Marketing Expenses120,000 Salaries Payable Control30,000 Accounts Payable Control90,000 Accumulated Depreciation, Office Equipment 7,000 Source Document: Depreciation Schedule, Marketing Payroll Request, Invoice for Advertising, Sales Commission Schedule. Subsidiary Ledger: Employee Salary Records, Administration Cost Records, Marketing Cost Records. aMaterials used = [pic] + Purchases – [pic] [pic] b[pic] = [pic] + [pic] – [pic] [pic] cCost of goods sold = [pic] + [pic] – [pic] [pic] 2. T-accounts Direct Materials Control | |Bal. 1/1/2011 |9,000 |(2) Work-in-Process Control (Materials used) | | |(1) Accounts Payable Control (Purchases) | | |122,000 | | |124,000 | | | |Bal. 12/31/2011 |11,000 | | | Work-in-Process Control | |Bal. 1/1/2011 |6,000 |(6) Finished Goods Control (Cost of goods | | |(2) Materials Control | |manufactured) | | |(Direct materials used) |122,000 | |387,000 | |(3) Wages Payable Control (Direct manuf. labor)| | | | |(5) Manuf.Overhead Allocated |80,000 | | | | | | | | | |200,000 | | | |Bal. 12/31/2011 |21,000 | | | |Finished Goods Control | |Bal. 1/1/2011 |69,000 |(7) Cost of Goods Sold |432,000 | |(6) WIP Control | | | | |(Cost of goods manuf. ) |387,000 | | | |Bal. 2/31/2011 |24,000 | | | |Cost of Goods Sold | |(7) Finished Goods Control (Goods sold) | |(8) Manufacturing Overhead Allocated (Adjust | | | |432,000 |for overallocation) | | | | | |16,000 | | | | | | Manufacturing Overhead Control | |(3) Wages Payable Control | |(8) To close |184,000 | |(Indirect manuf. labor) |54,500 | | | |(4) Salaries Payable Control (Maintenance) | | | | |(4) Accounts Payable Control (Miscellaneous) |20,000 | | | |(4) Accum. Deprn.Control (Depreciation) | | | | |(4) Rent Payable Control (Rent) |9,500 | | | | | | | | | |30,000 | | | | | | | | | |70,000 | | | |Bal. |0 | | | |Manufacturing Overhead Allocated | |(8) To close |200,000 |(5) Work-in-Process Contr ol (Manuf. verhead | | | | |allocated) | | | | | |200,000 | | | |Bal. | 0 | 4-26(45 min. )Job costing, journal entries. Some instructors may wish to assign Problem 4-24. It demonstrates the relationships of journal entries, general ledger, subsidiary ledgers, and source documents. 1. An overview of the product-costing system is 2. Amounts in millions. (1) Materials Control |150 | | |Accounts Payable Control | |150 | |(2) Work-in-Process Control |145 | | |Materials Control | |145 | |(3) Manufacturing Department Overhead Control | 10 | | |Materials Control | |10 | |(4) Work-in-Process Control | 90 | | |Wages Payable Control | |90 | |(5) Manufacturing Department Overhead Control | 30 | | |Wages Payable Control | |30 | |(6) Manufacturing Department Overhead Control | 19 | | |Accumulated Depreciation | |19 | |(7) Manufacturing Department Overhead Control | 9 | | |Various liabilities | |9 | |(8) Work-in-Process Control | 63 | | |Manufacturing Overhead Allocated | |63 | |(9) Finished Goods Control |294 | | |Work-in-Process Control | |294 | |(10a)Cost of Goods Sold |292 | | |Finished Goods Control | |292 | |(10b) Accounts Receivable Control (or Cash ) |400 | | |Revenues | |400 | The posting of entries to T-accounts is as follows: |Materials Control | |Work-in-Process Control | |Bal 12 |(2) 145 | |Bal. |(9) 294 | | | | |(2) 145 | | | | | |(4) 90 | | | | | |(8) 63 | | |(1) 150 |(3) 10 | | | | |Bal. 7 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |Bal. | | |Finished Goods Control | |Cost of Goods Sold | |Bal. 6 |(10a) 292 | |(10a) 292 | | |(9) 294 | | |(11) 5 | | |Bal. 8 | | | | | |Manufacturing Department | | |Overhead Control | |Manufacturing Overhead Allocated | |(3) 10 |(11) 68 | |(11) 63 |(8) 63 | |(5) 30 | | | | | |(6) 19 | | | | | |(7) 9 | | | | | Accounts Payable Control | |Wages Payable Control | | |(1) 150 | | |(4) 90 | | | | | |(5) 30 | |Accumulated Depreciation | |Various Liabilities | | |(6) 19 | | |(7) 9 | Accounts Receivable Control | |Revenues | |(10b) 400 | | | | (10b) 400 | | | | | | | The ending balance of Work-in-Process Control is $6. 3. (11) Manufacturing Overhead Allocated63 Cost of Goods Sold5 Manufacturing Department Overhead Control68 Entry posted to T-accounts in Requirement 2. 4-27(15 min. )Job costing, unit cost, ending work in progress. 1. Direct manufacturing labor rate per hour |$26 |   | |Manufacturing overhead cost allocated |$20 |   | |per manufacturing labor-hour | | | |   |Job M1 |Job M2 | |Direct manufacturing labor costs |$273,000 |$208,000 | |Direct manufacturing labor hours ($273,000[pic]$26; | 10,500 | 8,000 | |$208,000[pic]$26) | | | |Manufacturing overhead cost allocated (10,500 [pic] $20; |$210,000 |$160,000 | |8,000 [pic] $20) | | | | | | | |Job Costs May 2011 |Job M1 |Job M2 | |Direct materials |$ 78,000 |$ 51,000 | |Direct manufacturing labor | 273,000 | 208,000 | |Manufacturing overhead allocated | 210,000 | 160,000 | |Total costs |$561,000 |$419,000 | 2. |Number of pipes produced for Job M1 |1,100 |   | |Cost per pipe ($561,000 [pic]1,100) |$510 |   | 3. Finished Goods Control561,000 Work-in-Process Control 561,000 4.Rafael Company began May 2011 with no work-in-process inventory. During May, it started and finished M1. It also started M2, which is still in work-in-process inventory at the end of May. M2’s manufacturing costs up to this point, $419,000, remain as a debit balance in the Work-in-Process Inventory account at the end of May 2011. 4-28(20(30 min. ) Job costing; actual, normal, and variation from normal costing. 1. Actual direct cost rate for professional labor=$59 per professional labor-hour Actual indirect cost rate = [pic]=$42 per professional labor-hour [pic] = [pic]=$55 per professional labor-hour Budgeted indirect cost rate = [pic]=$43 per professional labor-hour |(a) |(b) |(c) | | |Actual |Normal |Variation of | | |Costing |Costing |Normal Costing | |Direct-Cost Rate |$59 |$59 |$55 | | |(Actual rate) |(Actual rate) |(Budgeted rate) | |Indirect-Cost Ra te |$42 |$43 |$43 | | |(Actual rate) |(Budgeted rate) |(Budgeted rate) | |2. |(a) |(b) |(c) | | Actual |Normal |Variation of | | |Costing |Costing |Normal Costing | |Direct Costs |$59 ( 160 = $ 9,440 |$59 ( 160 = $ 9,440 |$55 ( 160 = $ 8,800 | |Indirect Costs |$42 ( 160 = 6,720 |$43 ( 160 = 6,880 |$43 ( 160 = 6,880 | |Total Job Costs |$16,160 |$16,320 |$15,680 | All three costing systems use the actual professional labor time of 160 hours. The budgeted 150 hours for the Pierre Enterprises audit job is not used in job costing. However, Chico may have used the 150 hour number in bidding for the audit. The actual costing figure of $16,160 is less than the normal costing figure of $16,320 because the actual indirect-cost rate ($42) is less than the budgeted indirect-cost rate ($43).The normal costing figure of $16,320 is more than the variation of normal costing (based on budgeted rates for direct costs) figure of $15,680, because the actual direct-cost rate ($59) is more than the budge ted direct-cost rate ($55). Although not required, the following overview diagram summarizes Chico’s job-costing system. [pic] 4-29(20(30 min. ) Job costing; actual, normal, and variation from normal costing. 1. Actual direct cost rate for architectural labor=$92 per architectural labor-hour Actual indirect cost rate = [pic]=$50 per architectural labor-hour [pic] = [pic]=$90 per architectural labor-hour Budgeted indirect cost rate = [pic]=$54 per architectural labor-hour |(a) |(b) |(c) | | |Actual |Normal |Variation of | | |Costing |Costing |Normal Costing | |Direct-Cost Rate |$92 |$92 |$90 | | |(Actual rate) |(Actual rate) |(Budgeted rate) | |Indirect-Cost Rate |$50 |$54 |$54 | | |(Actual rate) |(Budgeted rate) |(Budgeted rate) | |2. (a) |(b) |(c) | | |Actual |Normal |Variation of | | |Costing |Costing |Normal Costing | |Direct Costs |$92 ( 250 = $23,000 |$92 ( 250 = $23,000 |$90 ( 250 = $22,500 | |Indirect Costs |$50 ( 250 = 12,500 |$54 ( 250 = 13,500 |$54 ( 250 = 13,500 | |Total Job Costs |$35,500 |$36,500 |$36,000 | All three costing systems use the actual architectural labor time of 250 hours. The budgeted 275 hours for the Champ Tower job is not used in job costing. However, Braden Brothers may have used the budgeted number of hours in bidding for the job. 30. (30 min. ) Proration of overhead. [pic] = [pic] [pic] 2. Overhead allocated = 50% [pic] Actual direct manufacturing labor cost = 50% [pic] $228,000 = $114,000 |Underallocated |= |Actual |– |Allocated plant | | | |manufacturing | |manufacturing | |overhead costs | | | |overhead | |overhead costs | | | | = $117,000 – $114,000 = $3,000 Underallocated manufacturing overhead = $3,000 3a. All underallocated manufacturing overhead is written off to cost of goods sold. Both work in process (WIP) and finished goods inventory remain unchanged. |Account |Dec. 31, 2011 |Proration of $3,000 |Dec. 31, 2011 | | |Balance |Underallocated |Balance | | |(Before Proration) |Manuf.Overhead |(After Proration) | | |(1) |(2) |(3) = (1) + (2) | |WIP |$ 50,700 |$ 0 |$ 50,700 | |Finished Goods |245,050 |0 |245,050 | |Cost of Goods Sold | 549,250 | 3,000 | 552,250 | |Total |$845,000 |$3,000 |$848,000 | 3b. Underallocated manufacturing overhead prorated based on ending balances: |Account |Dec. 31, 2011 Account |Account |Proration of $3,000 |Dec. 1, 2011 Account | | |Balance |Balance as a |Underallocated |Balance | | |(Before Proration) |Percent of Total |Manuf. Overhead |(After Proration) | | |(1) |(2) = (1) ? $845,000 |(3) = (2)[pic]$3,000 |(4) = (1) + (3) | |WIP |$ 50,700 |0. 06 |0. 06 [pic] $3,000 = $ 180 |$ 50,880 | |Finished Goods |245,050 |0. 29 |0. 29 [pic] $3,000 = 870 |245,920 | |Cost of Goods Sold | 549,250 |0. 65 |0. 5 [pic] $3,000 = 1,950 | 551,200 | |Total |$845,000 |1. 00 |$3,000 |$848,000 | 3c. Underallocated manufacturing overhead prorated based on 2011 overhead in ending balances: |Account |Dec. 31, 2011 |Allocated Manuf. |Allocated Manuf. Overhead |Proration of $3,0 00 |Dec. 31, 2011 | | |Account |Overhead in |in |Underallocated |Account | | |Balance |Dec. 31, 2011 Balance |Dec. 31, 2011 |Manuf.Overhead |Balance | | |(Before Proration) |(Before Proration) |Balance as a |(4) = (3)[pic]$3,000 |(After Proration) | | |(1) |(2) |Percent of Total | |(5) = (1) + (4) | | | | |(3) = (2) ? $114,000 | | | |WIP |$ 50,700 |$ 10,260a |0. 09 |0. 09 [pic] $3,000 = $ 270 |$ 50,970 | |Finished Goods |245,050 |29,640b |0. 26 |0. 6 [pic] $3,000 = 780 |245,830 | |Cost of Goods Sold | 549,250 | 74,100c |0. 65 |0. 65 [pic] $3,000 = 1,950 | 551,200 | |Total | $845,000 |$114,000 |1. 00 | $3,000 | $848,000 | a,b,c Overhead allocated = Direct manuf. labor cost[pic]50% = $20,520; $59,280; $148,200[pic]50% 4. Writing off all of the underallocated manufacturing overhead to Cost of Goods Sold (CGS) is usually warranted when CGS is large relative to Work-in-Process and Finished Goods Inventory and the underallocated manufacturing overhead is immaterial. Both these conditions apply in this case.ROW should write off the $3,000 underallocated manufacturing overhead to Cost of Goods Sold Account. 4-31 (20(30 min)Job costing, accounting for manufacturing overhead, budgeted rates. 1. An overview of the job-costing system is: [pic] 2. Budgeted manufacturing overhead divided by allocation base: a. Machining Department: [pic]= $52 per machine-hour b. Finishing Department: [pic]= 194% of direct manufacturing labor costs 3. Machining Department overhead, $52 ( 130 machine-hours$6,760 Finishing Department overhead, 194% of $1,100 2,134 Total manufacturing overhead allocated$8,894 4. Total costs of Job 431: Direct costs: Direct materials––Machining Department$15,500 ––Finishing Department5,000Direct manufacturing labor—Machining Department400 —Finishing Department 1,100$22,000 Indirect costs: Machining Department overhead, $52 ( 130$ 6,760 Finishing Department overhead, 194% of $1,100 2,134 8,894 Total costs$30,894 The per-u nit product cost of Job 431 is $30,894 ? 400 units = $77. 235 per unit The point of this part is (a) to get the definitions straight and (b) to underscore that overhead is allocated by multiplying the actual amount of the allocation base by the budgeted rate. 5. MachiningFinishing Manufacturing overhead incurred (actual)$11,070,000$8,236,000 Manufacturing overhead allocated 210,000 hours ( $5210,920,000 94% of $4,400,000 8,536,000 Underallocated manufacturing overhead$ 150,000 Overallocated manufacturing overhead$ 300,000 Total overallocated overhead = $300,000 – $150,000 = $150,000 6. A homogeneous cost pool is one where all costs have the same or a similar cause-and-effect or benefits-received relationship with the cost-allocation base. Fasano likely assumes that all its manufacturing overhead cost items are not homogeneous. Specifically, those in the Machining Department have a cause-and-effect relationship with machine-hours, while those in the Finishing Department have a cause-and-effect relationship with direct manufacturing labor costs.Fasano believes that the benefits of using two cost pools (more accurate product costs and better ability to manage costs) exceeds the costs of implementing a more complex system. 4-32(15(20 min. ) Service industry, job costing, law firm. 1. [pic] 2. [pic]= [pic] =[pic] =$65 per professional labor-hour Note that the budgeted professional labor-hour direct-cost rate can also be calculated by dividing total budgeted professional labor costs of $2,600,000 ($104,000 per professional ( 25 professionals) by total budgeted professional labor-hours of 40,000 (1,600 hours per professional ( 25 professionals), $2,600,000 ( 40,000 = $65 per professional labor-hour. [pic][pic]= [pic] [pic] =[pic] =$55 per professional labor-hour |4. |Richardson |Punch | |Direct costs: | | | |Professional labor, $65 ( 100; $65 ( 150 |$ 6,500 |$ 9,750 | |Indirect costs: | | | |Legal support, $55 ( 100; $55 ( 150 |5,500 |8,250 | | |$12,000 |$18, 000 | 4-33(25–30 min. Service industry, job costing, two direct- and indirect-cost categories, law firm (continuation of 4-32). Although not required, the following overview diagram is helpful to understand Keating’s job-costing system. [pic] |1. |Professional |Professional | | |Partner Labor |Associate Labor | |Budgeted compensation per professional |$ 200,000 |$80,000 | |Divided by budgeted hours of billable | | | |time per professional |? 1,600 |? ,600 | |Budgeted direct-cost rate |$125 per hour* |$50 per hour†  | *Can also be calculated as [pic]= [pic]= [pic]=$125 † Can also be calculated as [pic]= [pic]= [pic]=$ 50 |2. |General |Secretarial | | |Support |Support | |Budgeted total costs |$1,800,000 |$400,000 | |Divided by budgeted quantity of allocation base |? 40,000 hours |? ,000 hours | |Budgeted indirect cost rate |$45 per hour |$50 per hour | |3. |Richardson |Punch | |Direct costs: | | | |Professional partners, | | | |$125 ( 60 hr. ; $125 ( 30 hr. |$7,500 |$3,750 | |Professional associates, | | | |$50 ( 40 hr. ; $50 ( 120 hr. 2,000 |6,000 | |Direct costs |$ 9,500 |$ 9,750 | |Indirect costs: | | | |General support, | | | |$45 ( 100 hr. ; $45 ( 150 hr. |4,500 |6,750 | |Secretarial support, | | | |$50 ( 60 hr. ; $50 ( 30 hr. 3,000 |1,500 | |Indirect costs |7,500 |8,250 | |Total costs |$17,000 |$18,000 | |4. |Richardson |Punch | |Single direct – Single indirect | | | |(from Problem 4-32) |$12,000 |$18,000 |Multiple direct – Multiple indirect | | | |(from requirement 3 of Problem 4-33) |17,000 |18,000 | |Difference |$ 5,000 |$ 0 | | |undercosted |no change | The Richardson and Punch jobs differ in their use of resources. The Richardson job has a mix of 60% partners and 40% associates, while Punch has a mix of 20% partners and 80% associates. Thus, the Richardson job is a relatively high user of the more costly partner-related resources (both direct partner costs and indirect partner secretarial support). The Pun ch job, on the other hand, has a mix of partner and associate-related hours (1  :  4) that exactly equals the mix of partner and associate hours for the firm as a whole. The refined-costing system in Problem 4-33 increases the reported cost in Problem 4-32 for the Richardson job by 41. % (from $12,000 to $17,000) while it happens to correctly cost the Punch job. 4-34(20(25 min. ) Proration of overhead. [pic] 2. [pic]=[pic] – [pic] =$4,900,000 – $4,500,000* =$400,000 *$60 ( 75,000 actual machine-hours = $4,500,000 a. Write-off to Cost of Goods Sold | |Dec. 31, 2011 |Write-off |Dec. 31, 2011 | | |Account |of $400,000 |Account | | |Balance |Underallocated |Balance | |Account |(Before Proration) |Manufacturing (After Proration) | |(1) |(2) |Overhead |(4) = (2) + (3) | | | |(3) | | | | | | | |Work in Process |$ 750,000 |$ 0 |$ 750,000 | |Finished Goods |1,250,000 |0 |1,250,000 | |Cost of Goods Sold |8,000,000 |400,000 |8,400,000

Human cloning and Immanuel Kant Essay

Over the last decade, the advent of cloning and advancements in human genetic research have presented society with a complicated moral quandary. Debate rages as to what constitutes legitimate paths of inquiry and where to draw the line as to research that strikes many people as morally wrong. The basic question is: â€Å"how does society determine what’s right? † While, of course, questions regarding human genetic research are new, this basic question is as hold as civilization and has been addressed over and over again by history’s great philosophers. One of the most notable philosophers of the modern era is Immanuel Kant, who was born in Prussia in 1724. Kant paid a great deal of attention to formulating a complex system of morality. The following examines Kantian morals and how they might be applied to questions of human genetic research. Kant’s moral theory is predicated on the idea of the â€Å"categorical imperative,† which Kant described in the following manner, â€Å"Act only on that maxim which you can at the same time will to be a universal law†(Honderich, 1995, p. 436). By the term â€Å"maxim,† Kant meant general rules or principles upon which rational individuals act, and that these principles reflect the end that an individual has in mind in choosing actions of a certain type in given circumstances (Honderich, 1995). Therefore, maxims are principles in the following form: â€Å"When in an S-type situation, act in an A-type manner in order to attain end- E† (Honderich, 1995, p. 436). For example, a person might resolve to pay a bill as soon as it is received in order to not incur any debt. Kant tested a maxim by performing a thought experiment in which the individual asks oneself whether or not one would will a certain maxim to become universal law. As this suggests, moral law, in the philosophy of Kant, is inherent in reason itself. It is a priori, before experience (Frost, 1962). In every circumstance, Kant believed that â€Å"categorical imperative† provides a sure criterion for how to evaluate right and wrong (Frost, 1962). Kant maintained that an action that the individual can easily will that everyone should follow and perform would necessarily have to be a good act (Frost, 1962). Morality for Kant not only involved law (categorical imperative) but also the ultimate end to which action is directed. As the formulation of the concept of categorical imperative suggests, the basic problem for Kant was to discern the meaning of â€Å"right and wrong, good and bad† (Frost, 1962, p. 94). Fundamental to Kant’s thinking was the principle formulated by Rousseau that the only fundamentally good thing in the universe is the â€Å"human will governed by respect for the moral law or the consciousness of duty† (Frost, 1962, p. 94). He considered a moral act to be one that is performed out of respect for moral law, rather than for selfish gain or sympathy for others (Frost, 1962). Therefore, unlike other moral systems, Kant did not see consequences as the criteria for determining the moral value of a specific action. Rather, Kant looked toward the intentions of the individual. If an individual acts from good intentions, out of respect for moral law, his actions, are by definition, â€Å"good. † Kant argued that individuals instinctively avoid behavior, which, if performed by everyone, would create anarchy. â€Å"We know, not by reasoning, but by vivid and immediate feelings, that we must avoid behavior which, if adopted by all men, would render social life impossible† (Durant, 1961, p. 209). As this brief summary of Kantian ethics suggests, if Kant were presented with the problem of the morality of genetic research, he would, first of all, be concerned about the motivations of the researchers, their intentions in conducting such research (Frost, 1962). In the furor that was quickly generated over the successfully cloning of a sheep, â€Å"Dolly,† the usefulness of cloning technology to current medical practice was pushed aside. Nevertheless, the applications are considerable. A great deal of technical information has been left out in the sensationalism that abounded in the media. For one thing, the media did not make it clear that â€Å"Dolly† was not an identical clone (Wilson,1997). Part of everyone’s genetic material comes from the mitochondria in the cytoplasm of the egg. In the case of Dolly, only the nuclear DNA was transferred (Wilson, 1997). This may have significant information to import to scientists concerning the aging process since aging is related to acquired mutations in mitochondrial DNA (Wilson, 1997, p. 913). Furthermore, as Dolly ages, it has been noted that she is aging prematurely, which provides another source of information for scientists, but also signals that this technology is far from perfected. Research conducted on nuclear transfer into human eggs has the possibility of providing an immense amount of information that may have clinical value, by providing a model for learning more about somatic cell differentiation (Wilson, 1997, p. 913). Eventually, in due course, scientists may learn how to influence cell differentiation and this could give rise to targeted cell types (Wilson, 1997). The ability to generate tissues from different cell types could have enormous implications for transplantation. Wilson (1997) anticipates this technology utilizing skin and blood cells, and possibly even neuronal tissue that could then be used in the treatment of â€Å"injury, transplants for leukemia, and for degenerative disease such as Parkinson’s disease† (p. 913). In another area of research, the successful cloning of human growth hormone (HGH) is important for several reasons. First of all, a child that has pituitary dwarfism requires twice-weekly injections until reaching age of 20. In the past, HGH was could only be obtained by removal of human pituitary tissue at autopsy. To treat one child with pituitary dwarfism using previous methods required obtaining over a thousand pituitaries (Emery and Malcolm, 1995, p. 165). Not only has it been difficult in the past to produce enough HGH to successfully provide treatment to all the children who needed it, but small amounts of contaminating virus caused some of the children treated to develop Creutzfeldt-Jacob disease (Emery and Malcolm, 1995, p. 165). Cloning technology, which permits HGH to be produced artificially, has provided a readily available supply of HGH, which-in turn-has allowed the application of HGH in other treatments. For example, it has been discovered that HGH can be used to speed up the healing process for bone fractures (Emery and Malcolm, 1995). This is been particularly beneficial in treating the elderly (Emery and Malcolm, 1995). As this brief summary of scientific research being conducted into cloning and genetic research indicates, there are enormous benefits to be reaped from this new and controversial technology. Kant would undoubtedly approve of research that so obvious benefits humanity and society. What people seem to fear, and what would undoubtedly be wrong by any moral system, are nightmare scenarios propagated by the media and Hollywood. Images of clones being used simply as â€Å"spare parts† to extend the life of the rich, for example, has been dramatized in film. This sort of misuse of technology would constitute a threat to the social system and, therefore, would not pass Kant’s categorical imperative test. In other words, if everyone were cloned, it would significantly lower the way that human life is valued in our society. Also, the idea of human embryos being created and destroyed simply to further genetic research objectives is simply abhorrent on an instinctive level. Therefore, while it! can be seen that this technology needs to be carefully controlled and supervised in regards to moral issues, it should not be totally banned either, as it also has the power to benefit society to a great degree.

Business Economics for De-Unionization

In the entire Article, the author discusses about the increasing disparity between the upper- and lower-half of the society. The major narrator of the piece is Robert Reich who is primary illustrating the America’s social classes. The metaphor is utilized in explicating how the economy of America is fluctuating for the rich and poor. It is alluded to a boat that everyone is in whereby 1 is rapidly sinking 2 nd one sinking more gradually while the 3 rd steadily rising. The three social classes are referred to here including lower-, middle- and upper-class. The lower-class keeps going poorer due to job loss, increase automation alongside petition from other economies which are enthusiastic to work for less money. The middle-class is somewhat staying unchanged but remain still diminishing economically. This is due to machinery that is substituting employees, lower wages due to the surged social security drawn by the government from the retirees, alongside the stiff petition from immigrant searching for jobs. The upper-class does well and ascending past everyone else since they are the people who are thinking regarding selling their notions to overseas nations who could never think of them independently. The topic is anchored on the Robert Reich as both eye opener and simultaneously a cautionary for the society about the unemployment which the society shall be facing and is presently facing as a result of the lack of education and technology. It precisely enunciates that routine producers’ jobs and in-person servers have extinguished wholly as the contemporary techniques have substituted them. Reich posited that strictly individuals whose jobs remain on the upsurge are symbol analysts. The symbol analysts remain the actual problem solvers. The symbol analysts’ skills remain extremely in the demand globally since they are the people who initially examine the problem and subsequently solve the problem (Reich 15). The same unemployment problem alongside the global recession that has left workers focusing on workers not solely with skills of specialist but further a vaster array of knowledge and skills. The report remains a clear reflection of what is required by the modern day employers, but the question remains whether it is universities or learners individually that fail to cope with the needs of modern world that is marred with advancement in technology alongside critical thinking. The modern day generation alongside reasons for huge drop in employment are truly missing something critical. The opposition holds that the job losses in America is caused not by the immigrants into America but due to technological development and globalization. The opposition acknowledges that the main challenge is the employment crisis that the millennials shall be facing as a result of educational challenges, either in schools or in learners, and the similar period the ascending symbol analysts demand (Spangler 472). This is an eye-openers for millennials since the opposition has precisely illustrated all the challenges facing millennials and shall be facing in the ing years about employment. The main strength in my opponent claim is that it is true that globalization and technological advancement have greatly led to a laying off of many workers. On the other hand, the opponent fails to appreciate that as technology is advancing, many jobs are destroyed and through innovation, many new jobs are created and many firms upskill their old employees rather than retrenching which would indeed retain workers and even employ new ones. The Robert Reich Article remains wholly true. There is a widening gap between the rich and the poor. This disparity/gap is increasing blooming visibly as months turn to years. The rich are increasingly b ing richer since they are the people taking over the lower-class jobs and doing whatever they wish with them. Often, the upper-class fire all the employees and place in automatic machinery since it is increasingly effective and cost really less. The upper-class have further put a surge on immigrants over the previous ten years and it is still ascending today. The immigrants e to America and require jobs to support both families and themselves. This is the reason there is increasing jobs less in the US. If the American economy keeps up with this declining trend, there will people trapped in absolute poverty and those who are filthy rich. Accordingly many of the rich individuals shall refute to assist the poor, even where they are increasingly capable of helping the poor.   Ã‚  Ã‚   Based on my claim, the millennials’ future is analyzed with respect to unemployment problems the millennials will face as a result of globalization. The advancement in technology and entire world â€Å"going global† remains significant.   Unlike my claim, that I hold also contributes to the American job losses, I see sense in the opponent claim that attributes the job loss to the shift of jobs from the developed to developing economies established by the huge recession in the developed-economies to have triggered by the advancement in technology and globalization.    It is true that both claims remain cognizant that the main challenge is the unemployment. Whereas I attributed the lack of employment among the Americans to the petition arising from the immigrants who seek the same jobs to support themselves and families, I am in agreement with my opponent’s claim that globalization and advancement in technology have also played a significant role (Stiglitz 133). It is true that advancement in technology has made workers stay in touch with the entire globe with the assistance of certain optical wires alongside satellites and hence began hiring employees who were willing and ready to work for the lower salaries. In the same manner, introduction of novel labor-saving machineries like ATMs and robotized vending accounts for job losses. Both opposing claims have a sense in arguments and hence there is a mon ground. Both technological advancement and globalization have indeed led to job loses while at the same time Americans have lost jobs due to influx of immigrants. Reich, Robert B. "Why the rich are getting richer and the poor, poorer." The way class works: Readings on school, family, and the economy (2008): 13-24. Spangler, Eve. "When Good Jobs Go Bad: Globalization, De-Unionization, and Declining Job Quality in the North American Auto Industry." (2017): 471-473. Stiglitz, Joseph E. "The overselling of globalization." Business Economics 52.3 (2017): 129-137.

Turkey and Russia relationship during World War II Research Paper

Turkey and Russia relationship during World War II - Research Paper Example In the phony war phase of the Second World War, Russia got reach and control over the Turkish Straits which were of significant influence in the entire course of the war. Turkey had its interests intertwined with that of the Iranian affair and thereby it demanded more proactive actions from U.S.S.R in the course of the war. This led to overall bitterness in the state of affairs and diplomatic activities between the two states. Prior to the war, the two countries were interlocked into the treaty of Peace and Neutrality that was signed towards 1925. The development of the aforementioned scenario and overall tension led to the annulment of the treaty and further strangulation of the ties between these two states (BÄ °LGE 2012). Turkey found the demands of Russia being too advanced and unjust and this did not go well with the Turkish army. The Russians wanted to use the Turkish territory in the same way as was Poland used by Germany against it. Turkey would not allow this as it suspected Russia of having followed the policy that was continued from the days of the Ottoman Empire where the Russian state was alleged to have played a significant role towards overall weakening and subsequent destruction of the Ottoman Empire (Hale 2012). Strategic interests, Russia’s expanded interest in the region, past rivalry and past incidents of mistrust, Turkey’s refusal of surrendering to the demands directly made up for few of the causes of the overall resentment and disagreement between the two states.

Assignment #1 Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

#1 - Assignment Example His work can be used by the central banks to curb inflationary expectations appropriately. 2005: Robert J. Aumann and Thomas C. Schelling: They received the award for their research of conflict and cooperation through game-theory analysis. Schelling applied the concepts of game-theory to international relations. Prof. Aumann’s work focused on the issue of effect of continued repetition of games on co-operation. 2004: Finn E. Kydland and Edward C. Prescott: They received the Noble prize for their research on effects of business cycles on international trade. They examined the driving forces behind business cycles, and analyzed the temporal consistency of economic policy 1998: Amartya Sen: Prof. Amartya Sen received the Noble prize for his work on welfare economics in case of famine, and suggestions to prevent it. His work focused on the human development theory, the underlying mechanism of poverty, and political liberalism. The Oxford English dictionary defines theory as â€Å"an idea or set of ideas that is intended to explain something† (â€Å"Theory†). Formulation of a theory is a step-by-step scientific process, starting from an opinion to stating the final theory. The starting point of a theory is an observation of a particular process. The interest created by this observation then leads to the formulation of an opinion regarding the process. This opinion is based on the available information regarding the same process, and the researcher’s beliefs. These opinions are also a reflection of the researcher’s expectations regarding the outcome of the enquiry. These opinion and observation then lead to the formulation of hypotheses. Hypothesis is a possible theoretical explanation of the observation made by a researcher to fill the gaps in the research previously done on the subject matter. This is followed by collection and classification of the data. Data collection is followed by the formulation of invariance

To what extent can a measure of national income (GDP) Essay

To what extent can a measure of national income (GDP) - Essay Example Keywords: GDP, welfare, happiness, economy, wealth. GDP as a Measure of Happiness and Welfare Gross Domestic Product is a value of all the final goods and services that are produced in domestic territory of an economy, within a single accounting year. This is used as a measurement for finding out the different levels of growth in an economy. Not only that, but the GDP is used to compare the growth and development of one economy with another as well. However, with time, many economists have begun trying to find out the happiness index faced by the citizens of a country, with the help of the GDP. However, they fail to pose the following questions; what is the relationship between GDP and welfare? Can GDP be regarded as a good index of welfare among the people of a country? Or is it simply a measure for finding out the kind of growth and development the economy has undergone, not taking into account the actual distribution of wealth? While looking at the figures of per capita income and national income of a country on the whole, one may find that the country is prospering very well and has achieved growing levels of independency when it comes to its market segments and trade related areas. The country might be doing really well in almost all fields – right from the primary to the tertiary sector. But just because something looks good from the outside, it cannot be judged inside as well, can it? In simple terms, the capacity to purchase goods and services is what makes people feel satisfied. However, this capacity or purchasing power is available to the people of a nation on the basis of their incomes. If they have low incomes, then they are able to afford lesser and vice versa. The happiness index of a person thus, depends on the kind of satisfaction he is able to achieve, which in turn, as discussed above, is a direct reaction to the level of income earned by him. In this case, the GDP cannot be measured in terms of the number of goods and services sold in an economy in a year, but by the level of distribution of income within the country which in turn affects the number of goods and services purchased by different sections of society within a year. Therefore, the use of goods and services by different people in an economy is what contributes to their well being, and not just the GDP alone. The greater the magnitude of the GDP, the greater the welfare of the people, was what was earlier believed by most economists. However, with more development and consumerism all around the world, with people having higher power and choices in order to utilize resources to satisfy their needs and wants, the GDP itself poses very stark limitations to the kind of measurement it can hope to provide to measuring an index of welfare of the nation. (Osberg, Lars and Sharpe, Andrew) In order to understand this argument better, one needs to delve into the levels of distribution of income within a nation or an economy. The distribution of wealth is not unif orm in most economies, may they be developed or developing ones. There is always a clear demarcation between the haves and the have not’

Business information management Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

Business information management - Essay Example SWOT analysis is a marketing technique used by organizations to understand its external and internal environments. SWOT is an acronym for strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. The first two is related to the internal environment of an organization while the other two is concerned with its external environment (Stone & Jacobs 2001, p. 35). The quality and impact of information systems with regard to its benefits to both the company and its customers can be looked at according to four perspectives (Symons, 1991, p. 181). These four perspectives are determinist, mechanic, systems, and inter-actionist. In a deterministic perspective, the hardware and software is seen simply as a technological advantage that can speed up routine tasks. This implies that systems were solely used by employees to work faster by automating the different tasks within an organization. There is bound to be widespread fear that it will bring about large scale unemployment through automation of jobs. The mechanistic perspective views an IT/IS system as a set of machines that will make its operations more efficient. It will bring about reliability and accuracy to different levels of operations and tasks. The next perspective views the modern outlook that organizations are dynamic systems made up of people. Hence an IT/IS system should reflect the proved clichà © that the ‘whole is greater than the sum of its parts’. Such a system will more than justify an investment in hardware and software in terms of efficiency and benefit to both the company and its customers. The final inter-actionist perspective reflects the current view of the efficacy of an efficient IT/IS system. It takes into account the concept of human computer interaction (HCI). (Hassan 2008, p. 230). This should ensure that an IT/IS system should be interactive with active participation of all the stakeholders which includes customers. Such a